<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stumax.com/use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stumax.com/use/</link>
	<description>Sic Gorgiamus Allos Subjectatus Nunc</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stumax</title>
		<link>http://www.stumax.com/use/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Stumax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumax.com/?p=408#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Good point, Annie Nonymous.  Let me amend slightly:  Never utilize "utilize" when you can use "use."

Here's what my new Oxford dictionary (the one built-in to the Tiger OS) has to say about the subject:

&lt;blockquote&gt;USAGE: Utilize, borrowed in the 19th century from the French: utiliser, means 'make practical or effective use of.' Because it is a more formal word than use and is often used in contexts (as in business writing) where the ordinary verb use would be simpler and more direct, utilize may strike readers as pretentious jargon and should therefore be used sparingly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Annie Nonymous.  Let me amend slightly:  Never utilize &#8220;utilize&#8221; when you can use &#8220;use.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what my new Oxford dictionary (the one built-in to the Tiger OS) has to say about the subject:</p>
<blockquote><p>USAGE: Utilize, borrowed in the 19th century from the French: utiliser, means &#8216;make practical or effective use of.&#8217; Because it is a more formal word than use and is often used in contexts (as in business writing) where the ordinary verb use would be simpler and more direct, utilize may strike readers as pretentious jargon and should therefore be used sparingly.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.stumax.com/use/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumax.com/?p=408#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Slight disagreement.

&lt;p&gt;"Utilize" connotes using something for other than its intended or obvious purpose.  You might utilize a screwdriver to pound in a nail; saying "utilize" here conveys something that "use" would not.  &lt;i&gt;The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms&lt;/i&gt; gives another good example: "meat processors utilize [i.e., find a novel or profitable use for] every part of the animal."

&lt;p&gt;I know it's overused (and inappropriately used), but kept in its place, it's a perfectly cromulent word.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slight disagreement.</p>
</p>
<p>&#8220;Utilize&#8221; connotes using something for other than its intended or obvious purpose.  You might utilize a screwdriver to pound in a nail; saying &#8220;utilize&#8221; here conveys something that &#8220;use&#8221; would not.  <i>The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Synonyms and Antonyms</i> gives another good example: &#8220;meat processors utilize [i.e., find a novel or profitable use for] every part of the animal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s overused (and inappropriately used), but kept in its place, it&#8217;s a perfectly cromulent word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
